Negative Flameout Values

A recent firmware update addressed the representation of negative values in the phx42. Negative values always indicate a flame-out condition, where the FID is not detecting any VOCs due to a lack of ignition. The firmware update ensures these negative values are represented in a specific manner, avoiding confusion and ensuring accurate readings. The specific negative value displayed indicates the reason the phx42 is not ignited.

Reading Error Message
-40 “Pump at max power for too long, report the issue.”
-41 “Probe Flow is blocked. Check Probe/ Change Filter.”
-42 “Feels like you just removed my filter. Please give me a fresh filter so we can get back to work.”
-45 “Looks like we just found a high PPM leak. Wait 30 seconds and reignite me. (Chamber overtemp)”
-46 “Trying to ignite! If 3rd attempt fails, report the issue.”
  • Note: Most monitoring applications show this text as a popup.

 

Contamination During Calibration

When any analyzer is calibrated, any contamination from previous days leaks that burns off during the day can cause the readings to shift slightly. This is a linear shift across the scale. That is to say, 1 ppm (parts per million) of contamination is burned off, it will reduce ambient by 1 ppm as well as 10,000 ppm.

Previously, if the phx21 detected a value below the zero-calibrated level, it would enter a pattern of alternating 0.0 and 0.1 readings. This pattern was implemented to avoid displaying a negative value, which is not possible in practical scenarios as readings cannot be less than 0 ppm. This would result in lower readings throughout the calibration scale. All portable FIDs at the time could experience this drift, resulting in lower readings throughout the day as well as during drifts.

 

Calibration Adjustments to the phx42

When the phx42 is calibrated under contaminated conditions and then later burned off, causing the ppm level to drop below 0 for more than 1 minute, the calibration table is edited in real-time. This adjustment is crucial for maintaining accuracy, as it corrects all the calibration points for any leftover VOCs which may have affected the calibration process and are no longer impacting the machine.

Conditions must be met for this adjustment to take place. The firmware monitors multiple conditions to ensure the machine is ignited and running properly. If a flame out/reignition occurs, the calibration table will revert to the original version to prevent an outside factor, like a probe or filter change, from impacting this feature (the phx42 will shut down during filter or probe changes). If, after reignition, the ppm returns to negative for the required time, adjustments will be made again as appropriate.

 

Practical Implications

In the older portable FID models—including phx21, TVA1000, and TVA2020—negative drift would cause interruptions, requiring work stoppage, recalibration, drift failures, and rework. The phx42, with its improved firmware, eliminates these issues by ensuring readings never fall into negative territory and that accuracy is maintained.

 

Conclusion

The phx42 portable FID by LDARtools is an advanced instrument for VOC detection, with sophisticated firmware to handle calibration and negative values efficiently. By continuously improving its firmware, LDARtools ensures the phx42 remains a reliable and accurate tool for environmental monitoring, minimizing the need for manual interventions and providing consistent accuracy.

We recently encountered an issue with some phx42 units due to an update on 7/14/2024 of a third party tool used for sending settings.

 

This update started truncating decimal places for numbers controlling temperature compensation, which has the potential to impact flame stability and make drift assessments challenging. We have identified and resolved the problem.

 

Immediate Action Required:

 

For SpanBox Users:
Ensure your SpanBoxes are online using the Test Network Connection feature before calibration. If you have already calibrated and are unsure if your SpanBox was online at the time, connecting with the phxApp and running a self-check as soon as practical is advised.

 

For Non-SpanBox Users:
Run a self-check as soon as practical.

 

We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and understand its impact. We are committed to implementing preventative measures to avoid future occurrences by transitioning away from this third party tool to a service with which we maintain and can control updates.

 

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

This chart depicts one of the most amazing achievements in the history of the LDAR industry. It tells the story, with cold, hard numbers, of the unprecedented success of the phx42 as an LDAR tool.

The blue line shows the increase in phx42s sold since 2018. Thanks to our friends and customers for the warm reception our favorite analyzer has experienced! But the green line tells an even more amazing story. It shows the total number of RMAs per quarter since the birth of the phx42.

An RMA represents an incident in which a phx42 has to be sent to our lab for repair. You can see the green line’s initial jump (in RMAs) when the phx42 was introduced. We learned with each RMA. We thought deeply, made changes, improved our training, and made things better.

So even as the number of phx42s in service has grown dramatically (to more than 1300), we have been able to keep the RMAs per quarter to the same level we were at when we had only 250 phx42s in the field. The LDAR industry has never seen anything like it.

Thanks to our staff, customers, vendors, and suppliers! We are making history.

Component Prompts have been added under Field Events for a few months now. Thanks to the input and requests from our customers, we have realized just how versatile this tool is. We are excited to share some of the applications with you!

To ensure certain components are properly monitored:

To meet the safety standards:

When being used in conjunction with the Chateau Mobile Fields, it can prompt an extremely wide range of messages tailored to site-specific policies, consent decrees, or federal/state/local regulations:

Note how Chateau allows you to edit the label on a custom field so technicians can more readily identify the proper field in Chateau Mobile. No more getting confused about which custom field to use for which purpose!

Please inquire at support@ldartools.com if you are interested in learning more about how to take advantage of the Component Prompts.

 

If you have drains in your component inventory, it’s now time to see how conveniently you can manage them in Chateau!

You simply add potential reasons for failed drain inspections in AvoType, under Settings > Picklists, Category=Inspections. Remember to reorganize the rank so the most frequently chosen options will appear at the top.

Now, when you fail an AVO inspection on a drain, you can choose the reason for failure here.

After Checking In, you can find it in the inspection record:

Please inquire at support@ldartools.com if you are interested in learning more about how to manage drain inspections in Chateau.

In 2023, we closed out the year with 117 Chateau Databases in use, including full-scale LDAR management, Cal5.0 support, and ongoing SmartFlag projects.

Join us in celebrating this pivotal moment as we continue to redefine industry standards and create products that support our customers and their LDAR programs.

On November 21, 2023, we shipped the 1,226th phx42, surpassing the total number of phx21s (1,225) sold during its lifetime. As of November 30, 2023, we have shipped 1,242 phx42s.

Amazingly, it took us 108 months to sell those phx21s, and only 69 months to sell the same number of our newest model.

Needless to say, we are proud of this accomplishment and grateful to our customers for making our phx line the premier portable VOC analyzer in the world.

We also want to take a moment to recognize the extraordinary work of the team that designed, built, refined, and, now, repairs the phx42s. I know they are all delighted to be making such an important contribution to the LDAR industry.

And, most of all, everyone recognizes it is Jeremy Bolinger who deserves the lion’s share of the credit, which is why we joke (not really!) each phx42 has been handcrafted by Jeremy!

The BEST news is that as we make this announcement, 99% of all of the phx42s we have ever sold are IN THE FIELD, doing what they were meant to do: LDAR. That’s the important part. Maybe we will have a Brownie Celebration, someday, soon.

Portable FID (Flame Ionization Detector) technology has evolved significantly, and when it comes to choosing the right equipment for Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR), it’s crucial to make an informed decision. Today, we’re comparing two leading portable FIDs: the phx42 and the TVA 2020, to see why the phx42 emerges as the superior choice.

Lighter and More Compact

For professionals regularly using a portable FID, the weight and size of the device are critical. The phx42 weighs a mere 7.25lbs (3.29kg), making it significantly lighter than the TVA 2020, which weighs 9.4lbs (4.26kg). This difference is not just about comfort; it’s about reducing fatigue during long hours of fieldwork. The phx42’s compact dimensions (10 x 2.16 x 7.5 inches or 25.4 x 5.5 x 19 cm) also make it more manageable in confined spaces, a common challenge in field operations.

Rugged Build and Advanced Features

In the demanding environments where portable FIDs are used, durability is non-negotiable. The phx42’s aluminum case stands out against the TVA 2020’s plastic construction, promising better resilience against the rigors of fieldwork. Moreover, the phx42 comes standard with Bluetooth connectivity, a feature that costs extra with the TVA 2020. This modern necessity enhances data transmission efficiency and aligns with current EPA Consent Decrees.

Enhanced Performance and Adaptability

Performance-wise, the phx42 offers a wider detection range of 0-100,000 ppm compared to the TVA 2020’s 0-50,000 ppm. This broader range allows for more precise and varied measurements. Both devices offer a 10-hour run time, but the phx42 facilitates continuous monitoring, a critical feature for comprehensive area assessments. It also boasts automatic temperature compensation for extreme cold, a feature requiring manual intervention in the TVA 2020.

Ease of Maintenance and Use

The phx42 shines in its user-friendly design. It features quicker hydrogen refill times (~15 seconds), an important factor in maintaining operational efficiency. The device also conducts self-checks for machine health, reducing the likelihood of field breakdowns. Additionally, the phx42’s automated shutdown sequence to prevent internal moisture accumulation is a thoughtful feature that prolongs device life.

Cost-Effective Maintenance

Cost is a crucial factor in equipment selection, and the phx42 offers significant savings in maintenance and replacement parts. Components like the pump, battery, and charger are more affordable compared to those for the TVA 2020, reducing the total cost of ownership over time.

Conclusion

When evaluating the phx42 against the TVA 2020 for your portable FID needs, the phx42 stands out for its lighter weight, robust construction, advanced features, enhanced performance, ease of maintenance, and cost efficiency. These factors make the phx42 not just a tool, but a reliable partner in the demanding field of LDAR.

For LDAR professionals seeking a portable FID that combines performance, durability, and operational efficiency, the phx42 is an unmatched choice.

The Three-Pass System for a LDAR Tagging Project

Different methods can be used to manage an LDAR SmartFlag Tagging Project: the One-Pass, Two-Pass, and Three-Pass systems.

Method Description

The One-Pass Method streamlines the process into a singular, continuous workflow. One LDAR Project Technician (the Flagger) moves through the facility, flags the location, hangs the tags, and documents the components in a single sweep. At the end of the workday, the data is checked in to the LDAR Database.

The Two-Pass Method splits the process into two distinct stages. First, a technician (the Flagger) flags the areas for a workday. These flags are then checked in, and appear in the SMARTFlag tab in Chateau.
The second pass is then assigned to a different technician by the LDAR Project Manager. This technician identifies each flag, tags the components, and documents them. This process offers a more detailed and careful examination as it allows different LDAR Documenting Technicians to participate in the workflow, bringing in their unique perspectives and insights.

In the Three-Pass Method, the process is further broken down into three stages. Initially, a technician (the Flagger) flags the areas. Once the flags are checked in, they appear in the SMARTFlag tab.
The manager then assigns the flags to another technician (the Tagger), who goes out, identifies the flags, and tags the components. After the tagging process, the data is checked in.
Finally, these flags are assigned to another technician (the Documenter) who goes out and documents the LDAR components. This approach provides even more meticulousness to the process, with different technicians focusing on specific tasks, thus reducing the possibility of overlooking any details.

SmartFlag Grid

The SmartFlag grid in Chateau uses different terms to indicate the state of a tag. For example, “Pending” indicates that the tag hasn’t been documented yet. Flags can be assigned to techs, and multiple flags can be assigned to the same tech or to different techs in sequence.

Remember to unassign or delete flags that have been completed to avoid redoing them. Completed flags show “0 Pending,” which might confuse the technician.

Understanding the Porches

Chateau uses different Porches to manage the asset workflow:

1. Owners Porch
2. MOC Porch
3. New Component Porch
4. Reconciliation Porch (More information can be found in the Training Document.)

When a new component is checked in via Chateau Mobile(on the Android Tablet or Handheld), it appears under different tabs based on the technician’s role. If the tech is a Suggester, the component will appear in the New Components Porch, awaiting approval. If the tech is an Approver, it shows up in the New Components Historical Porch and the Component grid, requiring no further action.

When a component is associated with an existing tag, it appears in the MOC Porch. This happens because it isn’t a new component but an edited version of the pre-existing tag number. This feature is very helpful for LDAR True-Up Projects.

Creating a QC Tour in the MOC Porch or the Component grid is also possible. However, once you have saved a doc grid, the only way to retrieve it is to cycle it back through the Chateau SmartFlag grid by checking it in and out, though it must be assigned to you to check it out.

Controlling emissions throughout a refinery requires more than state-of-the-art artificial intelligence or monitoring equipment. In fact, detailed documentation is a massive component of any LDAR system. Read on to learn three LDAR program record-keeping best practices that can optimize your operations.

Create Clear Record-Keeping Protocols

The most successful LDAR programs feature clear protocols that anyone can follow and are compliant with relevant regulations. To achieve this, your LDAR program must answer three specific questions—which records require storage, where does each record go, and how often does that information need updating? Furthermore, encouraging highly detailed record-keeping practices helps individuals better understand the correct record-keeping actions for different LDAR components and systems. Combined, these two best practice tips enhance your LDAR program’s accessibility and usability among technicians, auditors, and other operators.

Update Records According to Regulation Revisions

Rules and regulations concerning LDAR programs are always changing. Therefore, your program must possess the proper infrastructure to support regular record-keeping updates to comply with congruent law and regulation revisions. Keep your LDAR technicians updated on new components requiring LDAR monitoring, record keeping, and more, and utilize a user-friendly software system that allows for simple record-keeping revisions at any time.

Self-Audit Your LDAR Records

Self-auditing is a common process within the industry that incentives businesses to identify and rectify compliance issues independently, avoiding intervention from the EPA or other agencies. Overall, a self-audit saves both the EPA and the business itself significant amounts of money and time. Furthermore, incentivized internal investigations often produce more successful results than third-party inquiries. Self-audit your documents and record-keeping procedures regularly to eliminate compliance issues effectively. As a bonus, these internal record-keeping investigations greatly prepare your refinery for a third-party audit from the EPA.

Follow these LDAR program record-keeping best practices to ensure a successful, compliant, and safe operation overall. Another way to enhance the performance and capabilities of your LDAR system is to invest in quality equipment and software. Our team at LDARtools has the ideal devices and solutions for your emissions control needs. Order top-of-the-line LDAR testing tools to optimize your operations today.